Tag Archives: property

Drones Over Your Property: Know Your Rights!

A drone is photographed in flight against a blurred sky background. Surrounding the drone are the words "Drones Over Your Property: Know Your Rights!" written in bold text.

Drones are becoming more and more popular, but what happens when one flies over your property? Do you have any privacy rights? Can you do anything about it? Keep reading to learn about drone laws and what you can do to protect yourself.

Is it Legal for Drones to Fly Over My Property?

The short answer is yes, drones can legally fly over your property. But don’t worry, you still have rights! Here’s what you need to know:

  • Privacy Protection: You have a right to privacy in your home and enclosed backyard. Drone operators can’t use their drones to spy on you in these private spaces.
  • Nuisance Laws: If a drone keeps flying low over your property and it’s bothering you, you can report it to the police as a nuisance.
  • Trespassing: In some states, flying a drone at a low altitude over your property can be considered trespassing. Look up your state’s laws to be sure.
  • FAA Violations: Drones have to follow rules set by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), like not flying above 400 feet. If you see a drone breaking these rules, you can report the operator to the FAA.
  • Legal Action: If someone keeps using a drone to invade your privacy or damages your property with a drone, you might be able to get a restraining order against them.
  • State Laws: Many states have extra laws to protect people from drones. For example, in Texas and Georgia, it’s against the law to fly a drone over someone’s property without their permission.

Important Note: Even if a drone is flying over your property illegally, you can’t shoot it down! Drones are considered aircraft, and damaging one can get you in big trouble.

What Can I Do About a Drone Invading My Privacy?

If you think a drone is spying on you, here’s what you should do:

  1. Call the Police: If you feel unsafe or think the drone is being used for something illegal, call 911 or your local police right away.
  2. Document Everything: Take pictures or videos of the drone. Write down the time, date, and where it happened.
  3. Report to the FAA: If the drone is breaking FAA rules, like flying too high or in a restricted area, report it to the FAA online or by calling (800) 255-1111.
  4. Find Witnesses: If anyone else saw the drone, get their names and contact information.
  5. Record the Flight: If you can, try to remember how the drone was flying, how high it was, and anything else that might help identify who was operating it.

Remember, never try to take the drone down yourself. Just focus on documenting the incident and reporting it to the right authorities.

State Laws Protecting You from Drones

Many states have passed laws to protect people from drone snooping. Here are a few examples:

  • Texas: It’s illegal to take pictures or videos of people or their property with a drone without permission.
  • Florida: Drones can’t be used to take pictures of private property where you expect to have privacy.
  • California: Using a drone to record someone without their permission is considered an invasion of privacy.
  • North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin all have laws restricting drone use over private property.

Important Note: While states have their own laws, the FAA still has the final say over the airspace. This can sometimes make things confusing, so it’s a good idea to check both state and federal laws if you have questions about drones.


Disclaimer: This blog post provides general information and should not be considered legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney regarding your specific legal situation.

Dispute Closes Curtain

Theater argument

Standing at 527 North Grand Boulevard in the Grand Center neighborhood of St. Louis, the Fox Theatre has maintained its status and prestige as a city landmark, earning the moniker, the “Fabulous Fox.”  Despite its well renowned history, preservation, and extended use, in 2021, the Fox Theatre became the subject of a land dispute lawsuit involving two parties who claimed ownership of the property.  Given the interesting arrangement of existing ownership percentages, it is arguably natural or at least expected that a legal disagreement would develop.  In the two years since its filing, however, the lawsuit has been settled.   Continue reading

Follow the Road to Ownership

Yellow brick lawsuit

Almost fifty years after a dress was gifted to a priest at The Catholic University of America, a relative is challenging the determined ownership of the costume. The significance of the blue and white gingham dress and paired white blouse is legendary. Judy Garland’s acquired costume in the iconic Wizard of Oz is one of four total dresses and one of two dresses with the matching blouse known to still be in existence. Actress Mercedes McCambridge, who died in 2004, gave the costume to Rev. Gilbert Hartke in 1973 as a ‘thank you’ for helping her through her substance use issues. Now, the priest’s niece, Barbara Hartke, contends that the dress belongs to her, as the heir of her uncle’s estate. Continue reading

Mold Covered Mansion

Property dispute

Although Megan Fox acknowledges that she failed to read prior reports and documentation about the state of the property, she agreed to move forward with the purchase of a $3.3 million Malibu mansion, once owned by Brad Pitt’s manager, Cynthia Pett-Dante. Among the claims addressed in Fox’s $5 million lawsuit against Pett-Dante, the actress focuses on mold and septic issues, as well as an illegal animal structure on the property. Fox stated that her main concern with the home was the presence of mold, which triggered chronic headaches and stress-related complications. The cost of fixing the stated issues was estimated at $500,000. Continue reading

Bedrock Burden Ends

Colorful house crisis

In a town 25 miles south of San Francisco, CA, a home sits as a page out of history. The Hillsborough homeowner, Florence Fang, has settled a lawsuit that was initiated in 2019. Following the issuance of three “stop-work” orders, the town of Hillsborough filed a claim against Fang, alleging that she needed work permits to continue the construction of various Flintstones memorabilia and statues on her property. In response to the lawsuit, Fang filed a counterclaim that accused the town of engaging in discriminatory demands and practices. Although both parties reach a friendly and agreeable resolution in April 2021, a gag order prevented the release of the information pertaining to the case details. Continue reading