{"id":7971,"date":"2019-09-24T12:39:12","date_gmt":"2019-09-24T16:39:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/?p=7971"},"modified":"2020-04-20T10:30:23","modified_gmt":"2020-04-20T14:30:23","slug":"walmart-customers-forced-to-window-shop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/walmart-customers-forced-to-window-shop\/","title":{"rendered":"Walmart Customers Forced to Window Shop"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_8222\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-8222\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/makeup.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-8222\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/makeup-300x216.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"216\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/makeup-300x216.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/makeup-768x553.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/makeup-1024x737.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/makeup-417x300.jpg 417w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-8222\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Beauty can get ugly<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>A $0.48 comb could escalate into a lawsuit worth thousands of dollars.\u00a0 Essie Grundy, a California resident, filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court in Riverside County.\u00a0 The filing stems from several shopping trips Grundy took to Walmart, during which she succumbed to asking an employee to unlock a cosmetic counter.\u00a0The beauty products behind the glass, Grundy argues, were specific to only African American use.\u00a0 On one particular occasion, Grundy asked to see a $0.48 comb from behind the glass and was not allowed to physically take the comb until an employee walked it up to the register to be purchased.\u00a0 Feeling racially attacked, Grundy proceeded with legal action.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Prior to filing the lawsuit, Grundy had asked a Walmart supervisor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/01\/30\/business\/walmart-racial-discrimination.html\">why<\/a> the cosmetics were locked up behind a glass case.\u00a0 She was advised that this added security measure was a corporate decision and employees were not able to deviate from the new policy or make any exceptions.\u00a0 The items that were locked up were classified as merchandise that is commonly stolen.\u00a0Those selected items may differ in every Walmart chain.\u00a0 While one store may lock up beauty products, another store may keep sheets or electronics behind a protective glass.\u00a0 Not satisfied that this reasoning was legitimate, Grundy filed the lawsuit in an attempt to prove Walmart\u2019s policy as racially insensitive.<\/p>\n<p>In the argument, Grundy claims to have felt like she was targeted as someone who might steal, which is not the case.\u00a0 She is seeking $4,000 in damages and is asking for Walmart to pay her attorney fees and adjust their newly upgraded security policy.\u00a0 On the other side of the lawsuit, Walmart, operating as a business, is trying to implement new tactics to avoid the risk of stolen merchandise.\u00a0 A representative from the company assures the public that the products selected for extra security are not meant to target individuals or present a shopping experience that is perceived as discriminatory.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A $0.48 comb could escalate into a lawsuit worth thousands of dollars.\u00a0 Essie Grundy, a California resident, filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court in Riverside County.\u00a0 The filing stems&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":230,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[548],"tags":[1794,62,2064,2674,2675,1066],"class_list":["post-7971","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lawsuits","tag-consumer-rights","tag-discrimination-2","tag-security","tag-shopping","tag-theft","tag-walmart"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7971","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/230"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7971"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7971\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8223,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7971\/revisions\/8223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7971"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7971"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.lawyer.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7971"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}